Bug#574798: libminizip as part of zlib distribution

2012-05-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 06:10:59PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Mark Brown wrote: >>> It's the fact that this isn't being shipped - having to run autoreconf >>> at all isn't confidence inspiring, as well as being a pain to actually >>> do while packaging. > >> This was disc

Bug#574798: libminizip as part of zlib distribution

2012-05-29 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 06:10:59PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > It's the fact that this isn't being shipped - having to run autoreconf > > at all isn't confidence inspiring, as well as being a pain to actually > > do while packaging. > This was discussed on the zlib list:

Bug#574798: libminizip as part of zlib distribution

2012-05-28 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Mark Brown wrote: > It's the fact that this isn't being shipped - having to run autoreconf > at all isn't confidence inspiring, as well as being a pain to actually > do while packaging. This was discussed on the zlib list: [1]. I think others are using it (i.e., this is not a sign that it is com

Bug#574798: libminizip as part of zlib distribution

2012-05-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:22:44PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > The main > > thing is the fact that it's not shipped ready for use by upstream, > > though - it's not confidence building. > What's unready for use about it? Just us

Bug#574798: libminizip as part of zlib distribution

2012-05-28 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Mark, Mark Brown wrote: > I'd really like to see some handling of symbol versioning going in > there in the first pass rather than having to add lit later. Makes sense. > The main > thing is the fact that it's not shipped read

Bug#574798: libminizip as part of zlib distribution

2012-05-28 Thread Mark Brown
tag 574798 - fixed-upstream kthxbye On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 03:27:24PM +0200, Schrober wrote: > What is the state of the bug? It is part of the zlib distribution since 1.2.6 The upstream stuff is *barely* there, it's not shipped in a form for people to use (there's just a Makefile.am which isn't

Bug#574798: libminizip as part of zlib distribution

2012-05-28 Thread Schrober
tags 574798 + fixed-upstream notforwarded 574798 thanks What is the state of the bug? It is part of the zlib distribution since 1.2.6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#574798: libminizip as part of zlib distribution

2011-11-13 Thread Mark Adler
Franz, I have included your patch for the next release. You can see it here, and pull that version for testing if you like: https://github.com/madler/zlib/commits/develop Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Bug#574798: libminizip as part of zlib distribution

2011-10-09 Thread Schrober
Hi, it seems that many tools started to use the core of minizip as part of their source code. This is quite problematic for distributions since they have to manually fix those files in case of an (security) bug. Therefore, it seems to be better to provide a library which can be linked by all pr