* Guillem Jover | 2010-04-30 06:10:05 [+0200]:
Hi!
Hi Guillem,
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:09:20 -0500, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
I believe we have consensus on the port architecture name of powerpcspe.
Is there any chance we can get the attached patch merged soon? I'd like to
move forward with
Raphael,
I believe we have consensus on the port architecture name of powerpcspe.
Is there any chance we can get the attached patch merged soon? I'd like to
move forward with getting an unofficial debian-ports.org repository created
and they won't do that until a patch has been merged to
Hi!
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:09:20 -0500, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
I believe we have consensus on the port architecture name of powerpcspe.
Is there any chance we can get the attached patch merged soon? I'd like to
move forward with getting an unofficial debian-ports.org repository created
and
* Moffett, Kyle D | 2010-04-22 19:17:17 [-0500]:
Not really... If you build GCC with --enable-e500_double it produces code
that is not quite binary compatible with code generated without that option,
because it indicates that the GPRs have an extra shadow 32 high bits that
can be only accessed by
On 2010/04/18 08:39, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc
wrote:
* Guillem Jover | 2010-04-16 09:01:16 [+0200]:
Do you see this as a possible workable solution, or is it completely
unnacceptable? Did I miss something besides what I listed here?
I don't think it is acceptable due
* Guillem Jover | 2010-04-16 09:01:16 [+0200]:
Hi!
Hi Guillem,
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:38:34 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
- variant two: a operation like a + b where we call in a library to
compute the floating point operation. Here we would put the
computation itself into a
Hi!
[ Sorry for the delay, been moving house. ]
First I wanted to comment on some things said on the bug reports and
debian-devel.
Yes, lpia was a mistake, I'd have preferred that the Ubuntu people would
have created a new repository with a rebuilt i386 architecture tailored
for Atom
Ping?
Raphael, any chance we could get more discussion or agreement from the dpkg
developers regarding the e500v2 architecture name? Both Sebastian and I
are in full agreement that the name e500v2 most accurately describes the
fundamental architecture.
I've included the summarized rationale for
* Moffett, Kyle D | 2010-03-25 17:49:33 [-0500]:
We can just use --enable-e500-double when building (recent?) GCC.
Yep, looks good.
Ok, so hopefully we can all agree on e500v2? That's the name I'm going to
go ahead and use in my newest build-cycle.
Yep, I think so. However we will see what will
On 2010/03/25 16:39, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc
wrote:
* Moffett, Kyle D | 2010-03-24 19:28:06 [-0500]:
The e500v1 was never very popular and all of the available parts today
support double-precision floating point GPRS. With that said, I'm actually
not sure if my
* Moffett, Kyle D | 2010-03-23 17:52:57 [-0500]:
Ah, my apologies. I'd actually already seen that one, but wasn't paying
enough attention when submitting the bugreport.
I saw in your earlier bug report that you don't have everything built
(yet). At [0] I have more or less complete port of an
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.5.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
At this time, we have the Debian binutils, gcc, and eglibc packages
building cross-compilers for e500 correctly with just a few minor
patches. A few other packages (libmpfr, libgmp) needed to be
crossbuilt (with minor patches only to
forcemerge 568123 575158
thanks
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Kyle Moffett wrote:
It has the unfortunate GNU arch triplet of powerpc-linux-gnuspe, when
it should have been powerpcspe-linux-gnu or e500-linux-gnu. This
causes much the same problem and has the same solution as the lpia
architecture's
On 2010/03/23 18:21, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Kyle Moffett wrote:
It has the unfortunate GNU arch triplet of powerpc-linux-gnuspe, when
it should have been powerpcspe-linux-gnu or e500-linux-gnu. This
causes much the same problem and has the same solution
14 matches
Mail list logo
