* Török Edwin wrote on Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 08:50:24PM CET:
> I'm not subscribed to the upstream ML, but when you have any patches
> you'd like me to test, please send me an e-mail.
Sure.
> > Many flags need changed libtool semantics, when passed through.
> > For example, just passing through -fl
On 2010-03-26 21:07, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> tags +upstream
> thanks
>
> Hello Török,
>
> thanks for the report.
>
> * Török Edwin wrote on Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:24:08PM CET:
>> Currently libtool strips -flto when called for linking which is wrong.
>> It should pass -flto to gcc, since its bo
tags +upstream
thanks
Hello Török,
thanks for the report.
* Török Edwin wrote on Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:24:08PM CET:
> Currently libtool strips -flto when called for linking which is wrong.
> It should pass -flto to gcc, since its both a compile-time and a link-time
> flag.
I agree. There ha
Package: libtool
Version: 2.2.6b-2
Severity: normal
Currently libtool strips -flto when called for linking which is wrong.
It should pass -flto to gcc, since its both a compile-time and a link-time flag.
Actually I don't know why libtool strips any flags at all. If I pass a flag
at compile time,
4 matches
Mail list logo
