Hi Sylvestre,
Am Sonntag, den 25.04.2010, 01:44 +0200 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> Well, for now, I would not prefer implementing your proposal. The two
> first cons seems to me quite important. It is a common thing in
> numerical computation software to switch between implementations (the
> various
Le lundi 19 avril 2010 à 10:21 +0200, Fabian Greffrath a écrit :
> Am 18.04.2010 11:16, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> > By the way, since it has been this way for a decade, would you mind
> > if I lower the importance of this bug ?
>
> Please set the severity to what you consider appropriate.
OK, tha
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:45:09PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > thanks alot for the effort you put in packaging the several optimized
> > versions of the atlas libraries, BUT I consider it completely
> > unnecessary to put them all into separate packages and leave it up to
> > the user to m
Am 18.04.2010 11:16, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
By the way, since it has been this way for a decade, would you mind
if I lower the importance of this bug ?
Please set the severity to what you consider appropriate.
Sorry but I don't know yet.
I've spent some though about this issue over the we
Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 16:33 +0200, Fabian Greffrath a écrit :
> Am 16.04.2010 16:08, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> > I can provide you a compromise here.
> > Beside the current packages, I can try to do a package called
> > libatlas3gf-all
> > which will contain all the various optimisation. The
Am 16.04.2010 16:08, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
By the way, in all cases, the best optimization will be to build custom
packages of atlas. By design, prebuilt packages of Atlas are not the
best solution.
The same is also true for the ffmpeg (and mplayer) package, which I
co-maintain. However, a
Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 15:34 +0200, Fabian Greffrath a écrit :
> Am 16.04.2010 14:45, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> > Well, some people do not agree on this.
> > I think it is important to let the user select the appropriate
> > optimisation for his computer.
>
> Yes, but since by default only t
Am 16.04.2010 14:45, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
Well, some people do not agree on this.
I think it is important to let the user select the appropriate
optimisation for his computer.
Yes, but since by default only the standard non-optimized library
packages get installed, it will always require m
Hello Fabian,
Thanks, it is always interesting to have feedbacks!
Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 13:52 +0200, Fabian Greffrath a écrit :
> thanks alot for the effort you put in packaging the several optimized
> versions of the atlas libraries, BUT I consider it completely
> unnecessary to put the
Package: atlas
Version: 3.8.3-20
Severity: Important
Hi,
thanks alot for the effort you put in packaging the several optimized
versions of the atlas libraries, BUT I consider it completely
unnecessary to put them all into separate packages and leave it up to
the user to manually select the on
10 matches
Mail list logo