On 2010-04-26 23:38:40 +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> There are two ways to approach this: either have the "&" inserted as
> now, with the space removed, which is the same as if the "&" was typed;
> or fix the suffix when inserting the last word. The drawback with the
> former (which is what it'
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:42:10 +0200
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2010-04-26 13:11:39 +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:53:31 +0200
> > Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > After a "zsh -f":
> > >
> > > % alias my_echo=echo
> > > % false
> > > % true &
> > > % my_ech[TAB]
> > >
> >
On 2010-04-26 13:11:39 +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:53:31 +0200
> Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > After a "zsh -f":
> >
> > % alias my_echo=echo
> > % false
> > % true &
> > % my_ech[TAB]
> >
> > A succession of [ESC] . (bound to insert-last-word) gives:
> >
> > my_echo&
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:53:31 +0200
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> After a "zsh -f":
>
> % alias my_echo=echo
> % false
> % true &
> % my_ech[TAB]
>
> A succession of [ESC] . (bound to insert-last-word) gives:
>
> my_echo&
> my_echo&&
> my_echo&false
>
> while I would expect:
>
> my_echo &
>
I've reported the following bug in Debian. It also occurs
under Mac OS X.
After a "zsh -f":
% alias my_echo=echo
% false
% true &
% my_ech[TAB]
A succession of [ESC] . (bound to insert-last-word) gives:
my_echo&
my_echo&&
my_echo&false
while I would expect:
my_echo &
my_echo false
Package: zsh
Version: 4.3.10-12
Severity: normal
After a "zsh -f":
% alias my_echo=echo
% false
% true &
% my_ech[TAB]
A succession of [ESC] . (bound to insert-last-word) gives:
my_echo&
my_echo&&
my_echo&false
while I would expect:
my_echo &
my_echo false
or even better:
my_ech
6 matches
Mail list logo
