On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:24:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Without getting deeper in the licensing of Othman itself, would you
consider the text of the Coran itself to be DFSG-free? I _think_ that
any religious text can only be distributed verbatim, not modified in
any way - That is
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 23:18 +0300, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
* Package name: othman
* License : Waqf Public License
Description : electronic Quran browser
Othman electronic Quran browser displays Quranic text in Othmani script style
as written under authority of Othman ibn
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:39:02PM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 23:18 +0300, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
* Package name: othman
* License : Waqf Public License
Description : electronic Quran browser
Othman electronic Quran browser displays Quranic text
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:39:02PM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
I wonder who many people use the word Coran for Qur'an in English. If
this is quite frequent, you might want insert this synonym somewhere in
the description.
In my experience, it's either Qur'an or Koran. I think Gunnar used
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 08:25:33PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:39:02PM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
I wonder who many people use the word Coran for Qur'an in English. If
this is quite frequent, you might want insert this synonym somewhere in
the description.
أحمد المحمودي dijo [Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:48:47PM +0300]:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
Harm others is a vague term that can be applied to a wide range of
activities usually considered ok[1].
I am indeed discussing this matter with upstream. That license
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:18:34PM +0300, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
* Package name: othman
Description : electronic Quran browser
* URL : http://othman.ojuba.org
* License : Waqf Public License
http://www.ojuba.org/wiki/waqf/license
While I do like the preamble of the
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
Harm others is a vague term that can be applied to a wide range of
activities usually considered ok[1].
I am indeed discussing this matter with upstream. That license terms
need to be clear not vague.
This fails the DFSG, unless
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:48:47PM +0300, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
Harm others is a vague term that can be applied to a wide range of
activities usually considered ok[1].
I am indeed discussing this matter with upstream. That
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 01:04:26PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Clear or vague, if they stick to a license that restricts usage, then
it fails DFSG #6.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/03/msg00064.html, for
example, for a quite similar case.
---end quoted text---
Yes, but it can be
Hi,
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 02:19:03PM +0300, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
Clear or vague, if they stick to a license that restricts usage, then
it fails DFSG #6.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/03/msg00064.html, for
example, for a quite similar case.
Yes, but it can be placed in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: أحمد المحمودي aelmahmo...@sabily.org
* Package name: othman
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Muayyad Saleh Alsadi als...@ojuba.org
* URL : http://othman.ojuba.org
* License : Waqf Public License
Programming Lang:
12 matches
Mail list logo
