Bug#582274: Isn't VP8 released as BSD?

2010-06-04 Thread Nathan A. Stine
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 18:10 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Do, Jun 03, 2010 at 16:22:28 (CEST), Nathan A. Stine wrote: On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:51 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:10 -0400, Nathan A. Stine wrote: Or so I thought. Diego Biurrun marked it as

Bug#582274: Isn't VP8 released as BSD?

2010-06-03 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:10 -0400, Nathan A. Stine wrote: Or so I thought. Diego Biurrun marked it as non-free upstream, but I'd think Debian Legal should take a look at the license to make their own determination. Well, it's IMHO not non-free (as in not DFSG free) but it's definitely GPLv2

Bug#582274: Isn't VP8 released as BSD?

2010-06-03 Thread Nathan A. Stine
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:51 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:10 -0400, Nathan A. Stine wrote: Or so I thought. Diego Biurrun marked it as non-free upstream, but I'd think Debian Legal should take a look at the license to make their own determination. Well, it's

Bug#582274: Isn't VP8 released as BSD?

2010-06-03 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Do, Jun 03, 2010 at 16:22:28 (CEST), Nathan A. Stine wrote: On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:51 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:10 -0400, Nathan A. Stine wrote: Or so I thought. Diego Biurrun marked it as non-free upstream, but I'd think Debian Legal should take a

Bug#582274: Isn't VP8 released as BSD?

2010-06-02 Thread Nathan A. Stine
Or so I thought. Diego Biurrun marked it as non-free upstream, but I'd think Debian Legal should take a look at the license to make their own determination. Anyone as confused as I should take a look at the thread where they discuss the proper problems with the license[1]. I sure hope VP8 gets