On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 18:10 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Do, Jun 03, 2010 at 16:22:28 (CEST), Nathan A. Stine wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:51 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:10 -0400, Nathan A. Stine wrote:
Or so I thought.
Diego Biurrun marked it as
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:10 -0400, Nathan A. Stine wrote:
Or so I thought.
Diego Biurrun marked it as non-free upstream, but I'd think Debian Legal
should take a look at the license to make their own determination.
Well, it's IMHO not non-free (as in not DFSG free) but it's definitely
GPLv2
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:51 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:10 -0400, Nathan A. Stine wrote:
Or so I thought.
Diego Biurrun marked it as non-free upstream, but I'd think Debian Legal
should take a look at the license to make their own determination.
Well, it's
On Do, Jun 03, 2010 at 16:22:28 (CEST), Nathan A. Stine wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:51 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:10 -0400, Nathan A. Stine wrote:
Or so I thought.
Diego Biurrun marked it as non-free upstream, but I'd think Debian Legal
should take a
Or so I thought.
Diego Biurrun marked it as non-free upstream, but I'd think Debian Legal
should take a look at the license to make their own determination.
Anyone as confused as I should take a look at the thread where they
discuss the proper problems with the license[1].
I sure hope VP8 gets
5 matches
Mail list logo