On Sun, 23 May 2010 00:36:20 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I interrupt sometimes fsck (when I don't want to wait), now this
doesn't work.
Wow. You are braver than me. I never considered that use case. :)
It is quite common. Interrupting fsck if it is not in repair mode is
Hi,
Selon Dr. Werner Fink wer...@suse.de:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:37:19AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Werner, any idea how startpar should handle ^c? This is the report in
URL: http://bugs.debian.org/582442 .
since last upgrade (makefile style migration ?) I got strange
[Matthieu Castet]
Please remember that the messages seen on screen are not
in sync with the execution progresses of the jobs. Those
messages are buffered to avoid extremly mixed messages.
Is that true for interactive process ?
Scripts flagged interactive run alone with direct connection to
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Matthieu Castet]
I interrupt sometimes fsck (when I don't want to wait), now this
doesn't work.
Wow. You are braver than me. I never considered that use case. :)
It is quite common. Interrupting fsck if it is not in repair mode is safe,
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:37:19AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Werner, any idea how startpar should handle ^c? This is the report in
URL: http://bugs.debian.org/582442 .
since last upgrade (makefile style migration ?) I got strange
behaviour of the boot sequence.
If I interupt
Package: sysvinit
Version: 2.88dsf-5
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
Hi,
since last upgrade (makefile style migration ?) I got strange
behaviour of the boot sequence.
If I interupt some script with ctrl+c, the dependency are lost (not fs
mounted, no network, ...).
With the previous version this
[Matthieu Castet]
I interrupt sometimes fsck (when I don't want to wait), now this
doesn't work.
Wow. You are braver than me. I never considered that use case. :)
Also on my system udev script hang at the end (until there is a
timeout). I often hit ctrl+c to avoid waiting the timeout. This
7 matches
Mail list logo
