Commit ceeec5623dbf19d8c96cd1187c5f17ed362cb5fe introduced a working fallback.
(but still we need to investigate more on that problem)
--
Marc Dequènes (Duck)
pgpyPneHckrrB.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 06:13:08PM +0300, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> 00databasealphabet Ci7Pl
> 00databasedictfmt11011 A c
> 00databaseinfo CJ Ve
> 00databaseshort 2 BT
> 00databaseurl c a
>
> Whereas, according to the dict format, these entries must be:
>
> 00
ãí¥ï ç¤¥í¥¨ïª ha escrit:
> Actually those databases do have a description field already, seems that
> this is actually a bug in dict.org module.
>
> For example, look at "vera" dictionary database.
It does not contain neither info, nor a description, nor any
other service fields. What it has in
reassign 582697 dico-module-dictorg
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 03:10:26PM +0300, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> > Many databases have no description at all (like english-german for
> > example), and even if it is a probably bug in these databases (not
> > sure it is compulsory in the DICT format), it ren
> Many databases have no description at all (like english-german for
> example), and even if it is a probably bug in these databases (not
> sure it is compulsory in the DICT format), it renders the database
> selection in the form quite difficult to use because we get empty
> names. It really shoul
5 matches
Mail list logo
