Hello Loic,
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Loïc Minier l...@dooz.org wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
So, why should we add the udeb in Debian, exactly ?
It would be nice to carry it to minimize the delta between Debian and
Ubuntu.
I fully agree that is nice to reduce
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:06:34PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Package: libxml2
Version: 2.7.7.dfsg-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch maverick
Hi
The attached patch adds an udeb to libxml2.
Is there
On Sun, May 30, 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
Is there something in d-i that requires such a udeb ?
Not in Debian; we use it for an udeb called migration-assistant which
imports documents and settings from existing operating systems (e.g.
Windows).
Thanks,
--
Loïc Minier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
Is there something in d-i that requires such a udeb ?
Not in Debian; we use it for an udeb called migration-assistant which
imports documents and settings from existing operating systems
On Sun, May 30, 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
So, why should we add the udeb in Debian, exactly ?
It would be nice to carry it to minimize the delta between Debian and
Ubuntu.
It might also allow the use of migration-assistant, but I suspect it's
not usable as is in Debian.
PS: for sizes
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:46:23PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
So, why should we add the udeb in Debian, exactly ?
It would be nice to carry it to minimize the delta between Debian and
Ubuntu.
I don't know if all udebs are automatically included in
On Sun, May 30, 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
- Link using -Bsymbolic-functions
- Add missing zlib1g-dev to -dev
- Build-depend on libreadline6-dev instead of libreadline5-dev.
(If you need to know why, please ping me off-list and off-bug)
Yes, I had already dropped all of them in the
On Sun, May 30, 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
PS: for sizes purpose, you should actually rebuild libxml2 with the
minimal set of options you require for your program. I doubt you need
all the APIs, especially the mostly deprecated ones.
Here's a second patch on top of the first one adding a
Quoting Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org):
I don't know if all udebs are automatically included in d-i, but if they
are, I doubt d-i people will like the additional 1.3MB uncompressed.
They aren't automatically included.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sunday 30 May 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org):
I don't know if all udebs are automatically included in d-i, but if
they are, I doubt d-i people will like the additional 1.3MB
uncompressed.
They aren't automatically included.
But udebs we don't
10 matches
Mail list logo
