Bug#584264: should not write fcc if sendmail exits non-zero

2010-06-15 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2010-06-13 20:16:31, schrieb martin f krafft: also sprach Michelle Konzack linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net [2010.06.04.2358 +0200]: This was already discused and an earlier bugreport closed... Do you have a reference? Now yes! It is Bug #264973 and was from 2004 Thanks, Greetings and

Bug#584264: should not write fcc if sendmail exits non-zero

2010-06-13 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michelle Konzack linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net [2010.06.04.2358 +0200]: This was already discused and an earlier bugreport closed... Do you have a reference? -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ you don't sew with a fork, so I see no reason to eat with

Bug#584264: should not write fcc if sendmail exits non-zero

2010-06-04 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Martin, Am 2010-06-02 20:56:00, schrieb martin f krafft: mutt writes a message to fcc even if $sendmail exits non-zero. I don't think it should do that as it might yield the false impression that a message was sent (e.g. if it was fcc'd to =sent, albeit not actually being sent). This

Bug#584264: should not write fcc if sendmail exits non-zero

2010-06-02 Thread martin f krafft
Package: mutt Version: 1.5.20-8 Severity: normal mutt writes a message to fcc even if $sendmail exits non-zero. I don't think it should do that as it might yield the false impression that a message was sent (e.g. if it was fcc'd to =sent, albeit not actually being sent). -- .''`. martin f.