On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>
> Along the lines described in http://www.asheesh.org/note/debian/rdfa-pts, it
> would be great if the PTS provided RDFa metadata.
>
Btw, there could be interest for other flavours of RDF, so I've just filed a
wishlist in the mo
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> >
> > Maybe this ontology :
> > http://github.com/nbarrientos/steamy/blob/master/ontologies/debian.owl
> > could be a good candidate for representing package metada
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>
> Maybe this ontology :
> http://github.com/nbarrientos/steamy/blob/master/ontologies/debian.owl could
> be a good candidate for representing package metadata in RDF.
I think SPDX (http://spdx.org) would be an even better standar
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Along the lines described in http://www.asheesh.org/note/debian/rdfa-pts, it
> would be great if the PTS provided RDFa metadata.
>
> I think it lacks just a few modifications in order to provide proper RDFa in
> the XH
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi.
Along the lines described in http://www.asheesh.org/note/debian/rdfa-pts, it
would be great if the PTS provided RDFa metadata.
I think it lacks just a few modifications in order to provide proper RDFa in
the XHTML output, that could be exploited by
5 matches
Mail list logo
