Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.94.4~bpo50+1
Severity: normal
Note that the initramfs is updated for a non-running kernel on package
removal.
The following packages will be REMOVED:
plymouth plymouth-themes-solar{a}
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
N
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:55:12PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.94.4~bpo50+1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Note that the initramfs is updated for a non-running kernel on package
> removal.
>
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> plymouth plymouth-theme
On 19 June 2010 03:11, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:55:12PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> Package: initramfs-tools
>> Version: 0.94.4~bpo50+1
>> Severity: normal
>>
>>
>> Note that the initramfs is updated for a non-running kernel on package
>> removal.
>>
>> The follow
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 03:17:20PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Why is sorting code required?
dpkg --compare-versions does sort rc images before non rc ones.
as mentioned in the manpages initramfs-tools updates the "newest" one.
here the assumption is that rc is newer then not rc, which is wro
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 19 June 2010 15:23, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 03:17:20PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >> Why is sorting code required?
> >
> > dpkg --compare-versions does sort rc images before non rc ones.
> > as mentioned in the man
On 22 June 2010 00:13, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
>> On 19 June 2010 15:23, maximilian attems wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 03:17:20PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> >> Why is sorting code required?
>> >
>> > dpkg --compare-versions does sort
; --
> 586363: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586363
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: maximilian attems
> To: 586363-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:0
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:30:58AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> I am not concerned that initramfs would not boot (which is what the
> backup initramfs is for) but that the new kernel might not boot (or
> might boot but bring the system up in unusable state) which is
> unfortunately not uncomm
8 matches
Mail list logo