-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[Following the thread in order to keep this talk in the archives.]
Le 19/06/2010 12:14, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
>> - <p>As you may have noticed, Debian is divided in sections: <tt>main</tt>
>> (the free
>> + <p>You can use one of the three following sections: <tt>main</tt> (the
>> free
> I am intentially neutral here based on voting record. I will not do
> this.
Thanks, just adding "archive" is better than my awful long patch, and
it's accurate.
>> @@ -2085,7 +2089,7 @@
>>
>> <p>If you don't need these, remove them.
>>
>> - <sect id="examples"><file><var>package</var>.examples</file> file
>> + <sect id="examples"><file><var>package</var>.examples</file> files
>
> This ends with s but this could be a file.
Sure, I just wanted to provide a consistent title with package.info and
package.manpages, adjusted on the other way in the current patch.
>> - <file>etc/default/<var>package</var></file>. This file
>> + <file>/etc/default/<var>package</var></file>. This file
>
> Thanks but this is intentional. This is under ./debian .
Sure, thus correcting <file>etc/init.d/<var>package</var></file> on the
previous paragraph, included in the current patch (hope this is correct).
>> <sect id="manpage"><file>manpage.*</file> files
>>
>> - <p>Your program(s) should have a manual page. If they don't, you must
>> create
>> + <p>Your program(s) should have a manual page. If they don't, you should
>> create
>
> These uses of "shoud" and "must" are my intentional choice as tutorial.
As you wish, but a manpage is not (and can't be) a "must", since some
programs are not intended to be shell executable: some CMS like phpbb3
have no use of a manpage, even if some documentation is shipped in the
package under another form, and the same remark is applicable to the
package main-guide... (It's kept in the current patch, but I won't
upload it if you are not agree, of course).
>> - <p>For <ref id="first">, we created 3 patches in
>> <file>debian/patches</file>.
>> + <p>For <ref id="modify">, we created 3 patches in
>> <file>debian/patches</file>.
>
> Why? (I am tired good night. )
The three patches are created in chapter 3 "Modifying the source"
(id="modify"), not in chapter 2 "First steps" (id="first").
The last diff of the current patch contains, in top of the nip ticking
"debianize" change a s/it/them/ at the end of the line (because I assume
we are talking about the added files, not directory to be edited).
I also included a patch to remove jargon neologism "debianize" as it
should be done next week in the Policy, cf. #586163 (I intend to propose
to do the same for the developers-reference).
Is it ok with you if I try and fix s/section/area/ to conform with
Policy (and DFSG) about what {main|contrib|non-free} are (I intend to
propose to do the same for the developers-reference) ?
Cheers
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkwdAOoACgkQ18/WetbTC/qd8gCcD0D/pAR2As65v6ZHiGsGKVlu
zF0An2RwJIeeKKT2CZc8rL0u0yGmDpSd
=cA4d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
