Hi André,
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:38 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:00 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > Hello Adam,
> > >
> > > > > Then what would be the relevant place for submitting patches of the
> > > > > remaining modules? Is it a good idea to send them to the bugt
Hi Adam,
>
> First, apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this. I was
> waiting for an opportunity to sink a good amount of time into reviewing
> your patches, and it didn't come, until I realized this morning that I
> had missed your deadline by a day. :-(
No problem, I understand th
Hi André,
First, apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this. I was
waiting for an opportunity to sink a good amount of time into reviewing
your patches, and it didn't come, until I realized this morning that I
had missed your deadline by a day. :-(
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:00 +0200,
Hi André,
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 10:53 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 09:34 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> I should probably try to quantify the difference between svg and png.
> With svg, after building I get:
>
> % du -s debian/salome-dev-doc/
> 720516debian/salome-
Hello Adam,
> > Then what would be the relevant place for submitting patches of the
> > remaining modules? Is it a good idea to send them to the bugtracker
> > like I did for the kernel? Or could I let them on the Mercurial
> > repository of http://www.python-science.org/project/salome-packaging?
Hello André,
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 09:34 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > I have enclosed most of the patches for building the KERNEL module with
> > > the 5.1.4 version. Moreover a start of the documentation that I plan
> > > to send for patches submission can be found here:
> > > https://hg.pyth
Hi Adam,
> > After a long break, I am back on the Salome packaging.
>
> Welcome back! I hope you enjoyed your break.
Sure, it was really nice.
>
> > I have enclosed most of the patches for building the KERNEL module with
> > the 5.1.4 version. Moreover a start of the documentation that I plan
Hi Andre,
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 10:45 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> After a long break, I am back on the Salome packaging.
Welcome back! I hope you enjoyed your break.
> I was pleased
> to discover all your advances and the new building process for every
> module. Thank you very mu
Hi Adam,
After a long break, I am back on the Salome packaging. I was pleased
to discover all your advances and the new building process for every
module. Thank you very much for all your efforts. I think that it is
the right time to start porting the patches to Salome 5.1.4 so we can
submit them
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 09:48 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> Hello Adam,
>
> ...
> >> The second issue is the Debian constraint to build Salome with a HDF5
> >> library needing MPI. The corresponding patches
> >> (kernel-hdf5-needs-mpi.patch,
> >> kernel-mpi-includes.patch, kernel-mpi-libs.patch and
Hello Adam,
...
>> The second issue is the Debian constraint to build Salome with a HDF5
>> library needing MPI. The corresponding patches (kernel-hdf5-needs-mpi.patch,
>> kernel-mpi-includes.patch, kernel-mpi-libs.patch and so on) are
>> not so welcomed by upstream.
>Really? Did they give an in
Hello André,
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 15:58 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> Package: salome
> Version: 5.1.3-10
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Last week, Nicolas Chauvat, Sylvestre Ledru, Christophe Trophime and
> I met some of the Salome upstream developers in Paris (at Logilab).
> We presented the current
Package: salome
Version: 5.1.3-10
Severity: wishlist
Last week, Nicolas Chauvat, Sylvestre Ledru, Christophe Trophime and
I met some of the Salome upstream developers in Paris (at Logilab).
We presented the current patches [1] on Salomé 5.1.3 for upstream
inclusion. They are not going to be accept
13 matches
Mail list logo
