Bug#587224: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#587224: Bug#587224: cryptsetup: cryptdisks-early boot-sequence difference in legacy and dependency-based boot

2010-07-07 Thread Jonas Meurer
Hey Mario, On 05/07/2010 Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:26:46PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: Both, cryptdisks and cryptdisks-early should Required-Stop: umountfs at My fault: They should explicitely *not* Required-Stop: umountfs (which would mean they

Bug#587224: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#587224: Bug#587224: cryptsetup: cryptdisks-early boot-sequence difference in legacy and dependency-based boot

2010-07-07 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:56:32PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: feel free to test if this restores legacy behaviour on your system, it does on mine. but additional testing (i.e. by you) is higly appreciated. Yes, it does perfectly on mine as well - in all runlevels it belongs to (i.e. rcS, rc0

Bug#587224: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#587224: Bug#587224: cryptsetup: cryptdisks-early boot-sequence difference in legacy and dependency-based boot

2010-07-05 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:05:22PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: On 26/06/2010 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: But I also think, that we should keep for compatibility the older order. agreed, next upload will restore old order. While you are at it, and since I don't know what exactly you did

Bug#587224: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#587224: Bug#587224: cryptsetup: cryptdisks-early boot-sequence difference in legacy and dependency-based boot

2010-07-05 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:26:46PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: Both, cryptdisks and cryptdisks-early should Required-Stop: umountfs at My fault: They should explicitely *not* Required-Stop: umountfs (which would mean they require to run before umountfs) but something like X-Stop-After:

Bug#587224: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#587224: Bug#587224: cryptsetup: cryptdisks-early boot-sequence difference in legacy and dependency-based boot

2010-06-26 Thread Jonas Meurer
On 26/06/2010 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:02 +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: I'm not really sure what's the intended boot-sequence but I personally think the legacy one makes more sense than the new dependency-based one (ymmv). The problem is, there is