Hey Mario,
On 05/07/2010 Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:26:46PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
Both, cryptdisks and cryptdisks-early should Required-Stop: umountfs at
My fault: They should explicitely *not* Required-Stop: umountfs (which
would mean they
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:56:32PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
feel free to test if this restores legacy behaviour on your system, it
does on mine. but additional testing (i.e. by you) is higly appreciated.
Yes, it does perfectly on mine as well - in all runlevels it belongs to
(i.e. rcS, rc0
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:05:22PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
On 26/06/2010 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
But I also think, that we should keep for compatibility the older order.
agreed, next upload will restore old order.
While you are at it, and since I don't know what exactly you did
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:26:46PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
Both, cryptdisks and cryptdisks-early should Required-Stop: umountfs at
My fault: They should explicitely *not* Required-Stop: umountfs (which
would mean they require to run before umountfs) but something like
X-Stop-After:
On 26/06/2010 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:02 +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
I'm not really sure what's the intended boot-sequence but I personally
think the legacy one makes more sense than the new dependency-based one
(ymmv).
The problem is, there is
5 matches
Mail list logo