On Tuesday 29 June 2010 14:28:28 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > KDE might or might not introduce a more generic progress bar application,
> > should kdialog --progressbar not suffice. So let us resolve the possible
> > conflicts as early as possible.
>
> However, I don't think that KDE appli
Hi!
* Sune Vuorela [100628 12:20]:
> I discussed it with Benoit and we agreed that it should not have been
> introduced as kprogress, but instead as a goto-fai-qprogress or a more saying
> name what the package is actually about.
Okay, it is nice that you talked and agreed.
[..]
> KDE might
On Sunday 27 June 2010 22:04:29 Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please explain your RM request in more detail. What do you mean with
> 'create conflict in the kde namespace'?
This application is a progress showing application for goto/FAI/... taking up
a very prominent name in the "generic KDE n
Hi,
please explain your RM request in more detail. What do you mean with
'create conflict in the kde namespace'?
Thanks,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.5
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
5 matches
Mail list logo
