On 07/07/2010 16:05, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> The computer in witch I had the problems is broken now. I'll be unable
> the test the new packages.
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
Is there a way you could provide us with the original .pki folder?
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
The computer in witch I had the problems is broken now. I'll be unable
the test the new packages.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Best Regards
El mié, 07-07-2010 a las 13:56 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez escribió:
> On 03/07/2010 15:00, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On ven., 2010-07-02 at 23:51 +0200, Yv
On 03/07/2010 15:00, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On ven., 2010-07-02 at 23:51 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> Looks like they are correct indeed, so we're back to speculations. I'll
>> try to rebuild an eds packages so you can test with the “old” pki folder
>> and see what nss replies.
>
> Coul
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 15:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Then run evolution with the “old” .pki in place and report back.
Please keep a 'pristine' copy of the old files too -- and in fact if
they don't have any special keys or anything in them, please let me have
a copy.
--
David Woodhouse
On ven., 2010-07-02 at 23:51 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Looks like they are correct indeed, so we're back to speculations. I'll
> try to rebuild an eds packages so you can test with the “old” pki folder
> and see what nss replies.
Could you install the rebuilt packages available at debian.
On ven., 2010-07-02 at 15:41 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> n Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:27 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > David: would it make sense to try fixing permissions in case they're
> > considered wrong by NSS and thus it won't open the db?
>
> I would be _very_ reluctant to do that kin
El vie, 02-07-2010 a las 16:27 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez escribió:
> On 02/07/2010 16:05, j...@o2w.es wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:09:47 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez
> > wrote:
> >> On 02/07/2010 12:27, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >>> This code isn't handling errors very well. First it ought to
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:27 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> David: would it make sense to try fixing permissions in case they're
> considered wrong by NSS and thus it won't open the db?
I would be _very_ reluctant to do that kind of thing. I don't want to
mess with permissions that someone else
On 02/07/2010 16:05, j...@o2w.es wrote:
>
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:09:47 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez
> wrote:
>> On 02/07/2010 12:27, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> This code isn't handling errors very well. First it ought to report the
>>> error more coherently so that we know what went wrong, and then
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:09:47 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez
wrote:
> On 02/07/2010 12:27, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> This code isn't handling errors very well. First it ought to report the
>> error more coherently so that we know what went wrong, and then it
>> should fall back to using the old DBM data
On 02/07/2010 12:27, David Woodhouse wrote:
> This code isn't handling errors very well. First it ought to report the
> error more coherently so that we know what went wrong, and then it
> should fall back to using the old DBM database instead of just failing
> completely.
>
> This should fix thos
This code isn't handling errors very well. First it ought to report the
error more coherently so that we know what went wrong, and then it
should fall back to using the old DBM database instead of just failing
completely.
This should fix those complaints, and I'd be very interested to know the
out
12 matches
Mail list logo
