Bug#590105: Buffalo LS-CHL not supported yet

2011-05-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Antonios Galanopoulos [2011-04-27 11:50]: > I am not sure what the differences are. I have successfully booted it > with foonas (http://foonas.org) via tftp and there it appears as a > linkstation Pro in the dmesg logs. Same with debian but the Sata > drives are not recognised. And SATA works w

Bug#590105: Buffalo LS-CHL not supported yet

2011-04-27 Thread Antonios Galanopoulos
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:20:27 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Antonios Galanopoulos [2011-04-27 00:04]: > Which device are you interested in? Buffalo Linkstation Live (LS-CHL) > or Buffalo Linkstation Mini (LS-WSGL)? Its a Linkstation Pro Duo. (LS-WTGL/R1) Is this different to the normal P

Bug#590105: Buffalo LS-CHL not supported yet

2011-04-27 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Antonios Galanopoulos [2011-04-27 00:04]: > > Which device are you interested in? Buffalo Linkstation Live (LS-CHL) > > or Buffalo Linkstation Mini (LS-WSGL)? > > Its a Linkstation Pro Duo. (LS-WTGL/R1) Is this different to the normal Pro? If so, it's not supported by the upstream kernel and

Bug#590105: Buffalo LS-CHL not supported yet

2011-04-26 Thread Antonios Galanopoulos
Hi, Martin Michlmayr said : > Which device are you interested in? Buffalo Linkstation Live (LS-CHL) > or Buffalo Linkstation Mini (LS-WSGL)? Its a Linkstation Pro Duo. (LS-WTGL/R1) Thanks! > > -- > Martin Michlmayr > http://www.cyrius.com/ > -- | |'`'. .''... |

Bug#590105: Buffalo LS-CHL not supported yet

2011-04-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Antonios Galanopoulos [2011-04-16 19:05]: > >It's supported in the kernel now. It's not supported in the installer > >yet (there are open bugs for this already). > > Can you point me to those bugs so I can follow their progress please? I > really like to get my last year > Christmas present w

Bug#590105: Buffalo LS-CHL not supported yet

2011-04-16 Thread Antonios Galanopoulos
>>* Sébastien LALLEMAND [2011-04-03 08:44]: >> The same things happened as when I previously opened the bug (SATA link down >> in dmesg). >> >> Did I miss something or can we reopen the bug ? > >It's supported in the kernel now. It's not supported in the installer >yet (there are open bugs for t

Bug#590105: Buffalo LS-CHL not supported yet

2011-04-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Sébastien LALLEMAND [2011-04-03 08:44]: > The same things happened as when I previously opened the bug (SATA link down > in dmesg). > > Did I miss something or can we reopen the bug ? It's supported in the kernel now. It's not supported in the installer yet (there are open bugs for this alrea

Bug#590105: Buffalo LS-CHL not supported yet

2011-04-02 Thread Sébastien LALLEMAND
Hello, I'm sorry to tell that the bug is still there. I have just test the new installer from http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/installer-armel/current/images/orion5x/network-console/buffalo/lspro/ . The same things happened as when I previously opened the bug (SATA link down in d