Bug#590147: Upgrade

2012-06-15 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
severity 590147 important thanks On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:50:08AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:28:31AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: The two are from my point of view RC No, the first part is not RC because: 1) it is rare enough 2) there is no

Bug#590147: Upgrade

2012-05-27 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:28:31AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: The two are from my point of view RC No, the first part is not RC because: 1) it is rare enough 2) there is no data loss involved There is no info about the 2nd part and according to upstream, the bug has been there

Bug#590147: Upgrade

2010-11-29 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Modestas Vainius modes...@vainius.eu wrote: tags 590147 help thanks Hello, On antradienis 09 Lapkritis 2010 11:23:53 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: But now there are too many variables. To make things worse, akregator developement isn't very active upstream.

Bug#590147: Upgrade

2010-11-29 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On pirmadienis 29 Lapkritis 2010 10:21:13 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: . However, there is no information how and when akregator fails to write correct archive file or otherwise corrupts it. I agree also with this part. But it is a second bug Should I duplicate the bug ? No. The

Bug#590147: Upgrade

2010-11-28 Thread Modestas Vainius
tags 590147 help thanks Hello, On antradienis 09 Lapkritis 2010 11:23:53 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: But now there are too many variables. To make things worse, akregator developement isn't very active upstream. I have not the skills to debug this bug, but they are some file that coul

Bug#590147: Upgrade

2010-11-09 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
No this bug occurs after an upgrade. Upgrade from what version? upgrade to 1.6.5 I could start agregator after deleting all my archive... So crash each time or loss all archive. This supports my assumption that the problem is cache corruption. No it is an archive problem. Not a cahce