Bug#590487: Misses postscript fonts from gs

2010-08-05 Thread Michael Gilbert
reassign 590487 poppler thanks On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:40:42 +0200 Vincent Fourmond wrote: > user fourm...@debian.org > usertag 590487 workaround > thanks > > On 27/07/10 05:00, Michael Gilbert wrote: > >> What is puzzling me more is that in principle, I have the same > >> configuration at work

Bug#590487: Misses postscript fonts from gs

2010-08-03 Thread Vincent Fourmond
user fourm...@debian.org usertag 590487 workaround thanks On 27/07/10 05:00, Michael Gilbert wrote: >> What is puzzling me more is that in principle, I have the same >> configuration at work, and it just works... > > do you have the gsfonts package installed? i'm thinking we may need an > exp

Bug#590487: Misses postscript fonts from gs

2010-07-27 Thread Vincent Fourmond
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > do you have the gsfonts package installed?  i'm thinking we may need an > explicit > dependency on that.  can you install that (if missing) and retest? Unfortunately, I already had the gsfonts package... > i tested this on my system, a

Bug#590487: Misses postscript fonts from gs

2010-07-26 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:45:21 +0200 Vincent Fourmond wrote: > Package: xpdf > Version: 3.02-9 > Severity: normal > > Hello, > > I have some trouble making xpdf work with default PDF fonts coming > from gsfonts: as can be seen from the attached file, xpdf misses > completely the font and uses