James Vega a écrit :
A different markdown syntax file was included in Vim proper for 7.3.
This handles the described scenario.
The last version of mkd.vim handles this properly now. Also, the two
syntax files can probably co-exist since they have different names (mkd,
markdown).
--
Denis
also sprach Denis Laxalde dlaxa...@gmail.com [2011.03.01.1632 +0100]:
The last version of mkd.vim handles this properly now. Also, the two
syntax files can probably co-exist since they have different names (mkd,
markdown).
But such redundancy isn't desirable, now is it?
--
.''`. martin f.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:37 AM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:
also sprach Denis Laxalde dlaxa...@gmail.com [2011.03.01.1632 +0100]:
The last version of mkd.vim handles this properly now. Also, the two
syntax files can probably co-exist since they have different names (mkd,
James Vega james...@debian.org wrote [2011-03-01]:
But such redundancy isn't desirable, now is it?
Especially given that the officially sanctioned filetype name is
markdown, not mkd as used by this script. By using mkd as the
filetype, you now lose any benefit of the other official
4 matches
Mail list logo