Bug#593504: mawk: Does not produce incremental output, even with fflush() calls

2012-11-29 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:06:56PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > Given that mawk's trying to be fast, doing what gawk is doing would > > > detract from that goal. The option's there for people who want it. By the way, the traces also show that mawk is making fewer library calls than gawk. Cu

Bug#593504: mawk: Does not produce incremental output, even with fflush() calls

2012-11-29 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 08:40:07PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:03:24PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > tags 593504 + upstream > > quit > > > > Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > > > thanks - I see that it's not fixed in upstream > > > > Tagging accordingly. > > I happened

Bug#593504: mawk: Does not produce incremental output, even with fflush() calls

2012-11-28 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:03:24PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > tags 593504 + upstream > quit > > Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > thanks - I see that it's not fixed in upstream > > Tagging accordingly. I happened to revisit this one, and realized it's not a bug per se. gawk does a fflush after e

Bug#593504: mawk: Does not produce incremental output, even with fflush() calls

2010-08-18 Thread Jonathan Nieder
tags 593504 + upstream quit Thomas Dickey wrote: > thanks - I see that it's not fixed in upstream Tagging accordingly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#593504: mawk: Does not produce incremental output, even with fflush() calls

2010-08-18 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, ja...@minilop.net wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Josh Triplett wrote: $ for i in `seq 10` ; do echo x ; sleep 1 ; done | gawk '{ print $1 ; fflush() }' | ts Is "ts" a package program, or one of your own scripts? (this

Bug#593504: mawk: Does not produce incremental output, even with fflush() calls

2010-08-18 Thread ja...@minilop.net
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Josh Triplett wrote: >> $ for i in `seq 10` ; do echo x ; sleep 1 ; done | gawk '{ print $1 ; >> fflush() }' | ts > > Is "ts" a package program, or one of your own scripts? > > (this is probably fixed upstream, but I'd li

Bug#593504: mawk: Does not produce incremental output, even with fflush() calls

2010-08-18 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Josh Triplett wrote: Package: mawk Version: 1.3.3-15 Severity: normal $ for i in `seq 10` ; do echo x ; sleep 1 ; done | gawk '{ print $1 ; fflush() }' | ts Is "ts" a package program, or one of your own scripts? (this is probably fixed upstream, but I'd like to verify t

Bug#593504: mawk: Does not produce incremental output, even with fflush() calls

2010-08-18 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: mawk Version: 1.3.3-15 Severity: normal $ for i in `seq 10` ; do echo x ; sleep 1 ; done | gawk '{ print $1 ; fflush() }' | ts Aug 18 12:16:39 x Aug 18 12:16:40 x Aug 18 12:16:41 x Aug 18 12:16:42 x Aug 18 12:16:43 x Aug 18 12:16:44 x Aug 18 12:16:45 x Aug 18 12:16:46 x Aug 18 12:16:47 x