On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:29:09PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:23:30PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Looks good. Please tell us when you've uploaded it.
> I uploaded the package and it has been accepted.
Unblocked.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Descrip
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:23:30PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Looks good. Please tell us when you've uploaded it.
I uploaded the package and it has been accepted.
Regards,
Jan Dittberner
--
Jan Dittberner - Debian Developer
GPG-key: 4096R/558FB8DD 2009-05-10
B2FF 1D95 CE8F 7A22 DF4
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:05:16PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> I attach a diff of my changes. Please confirm whether I should upload the
> changed package and whether the package would qualify for unblock with these
> changes.
Looks good. Please tell us when you've uploaded it.
Kind regards,
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:18:58PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Jan,
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:25:14PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> > I just uploaded pam-pgsql/0.7.1-3 to unstable. The new upload fixes #594721
> > and
> > #596375. The first bug is security related, the patch is in producti
Jan,
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:25:14PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> I just uploaded pam-pgsql/0.7.1-3 to unstable. The new upload fixes #594721
> and
> #596375. The first bug is security related, the patch is in production use by
> the bug submitter and looks sane to me. The second bug is RC b
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pam-pgsql
I just uploaded pam-pgsql/0.7.1-3 to unstable. The new upload fixes #594721 and
#596375. The first bug is security related, the patch is in production use b
6 matches
Mail list logo
