On 11/20/2010 11:55 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Try 'mii-tool -vv eth0'?
New output. Just in case, I tried it with a third and fourth v, no
difference. This is with it hard-set to 100 full, I can do it with it
set to auto when I get home.
frodo:~# mii-tool -vv eth0
Using SIOCGMIIPHY=0x8947
e
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 10:20 -0700, Shawn Heisey wrote:
[...]
> ethtool -d eth0:
> Unknown RealTek chip (mask: 0x2800)
So this is an RTL8168d, for which the upstream driver does load a
firmware blob. It's possible that that blob fixes this bug (it's never
been made clear just what it does).
>
On 11/20/2010 10:20 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
Unknown RealTek chip (mask: 0x2800)
I found what looks like a bug report and resolution for this same chip
and problem in FreeBSD.
http://www.pubbs.net/200904/netbsd/15177-50rc3-messed-up-rtl8111dl-onboard-nic.html
I know there are licensing i
On 9/11/2010 8:15 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Please try this while running kernel version 2.6.32:
1. Enable additional error logging by running: ethtool -s eth0 msglvl 0x3f
2. Enable autoneg again
3. Disconnect and reconnect the cable
4. Check for any new error messages in the kernel log
Also send
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 16:02 -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/11/2010 10:46 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 01:03 -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> >> On 9/10/2010 4:57 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> > Please test a newer version. There was a bug fix to r8169 in version
> >> > 2
Forwarded Message
From: Shawn Heisey
To: Ben Hutchings
Subject: Re: Bug#596390: Log messages from 2.6.30 and 2.6.32
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:03:40 -0600
On 9/10/2010 4:57 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Please test a newer version. There was a bug fix to r8169 in vers
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 01:03 -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/10/2010 4:57 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Please test a newer version. There was a bug fix to r8169 in version
> > 2.6.32-16 which might address this.
>
> I've already got 2.6.32-20, significantly newer than the -16 you're
> mention
On 9/10/2010 4:57 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Please test a newer version. There was a bug fix to r8169 in version
2.6.32-16 which might address this.
I was already on the -20 version. Then I tried the -21 recently added
to the backports archive, with no change.
After a little experimentati
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 16:31 -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> Here's the full kernel log from both versions, taken a couple of
> minutes apart.
>
> I've had this trouble for quite some time, ever since 2.6.32 made it
> into lenny-backports. I'd like to get on the new kernel version and
> eliminate
9 matches
Mail list logo
