Bug#597225: libpam-modules: 'nofile' limit set in limits.conf not applied

2011-05-09 Thread Teodor MICU
2011/5/5 Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org: The manpage appears to be inaccurate, then and needs fixing; but that's entirely separate from this bug report, which was about wildcard nofile limits not being applied *at all*. I didn't found any reference about this even after re-reading all the

Bug#597225: libpam-modules: 'nofile' limit set in limits.conf not applied

2011-05-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 06:44:11PM +0300, Teodor MICU wrote: 2011/5/5 Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org: The manpage appears to be inaccurate, then and needs fixing; but that's entirely separate from this bug report, which was about wildcard nofile limits not being applied *at all*. I

Bug#597225: libpam-modules: 'nofile' limit set in limits.conf not applied

2011-05-05 Thread Teodor
Package: libpam-modules Version: 1.1.1-6.1 Severity: normal Hi, I have tested and confirmed that this is fixed in squeeze. I believe the actual fix was the change in version 1.0.1-9 to fix Ubuntu bug #314222, describing a similar issue as this one. Marking this bug as resolved. Actually,

Bug#597225: libpam-modules: 'nofile' limit set in limits.conf not applied

2011-05-05 Thread Steve Langasek
notfound 597225 1.1.1-6.1 thanks On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:57:35PM +0300, Teodor wrote: Package: libpam-modules Version: 1.1.1-6.1 Severity: normal I have tested and confirmed that this is fixed in squeeze. I believe the actual fix was the change in version 1.0.1-9 to fix Ubuntu bug