Hi,
just a short heads-up to motivate the packaging of libjpeg-turbo.
The Steam for Linux package [1] has a dependency on libjpeg8-turbo,
hence the unavailability of libjpeg-turbo currently means Debian users
cannot install Steam (besides the fact that libc6 is too old, too).
Cheers,
Adrian
>
Hi,
libjpeg-turbo packages now in ubuntu:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg-turbo/
There is also a new ITP at #612341
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:19:39PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:30:40PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > My plan is to move to libjpeg8. libjpeg62 is a technological dead-end.
> > libjpeg8 support a larger part of the JPEG standard than libjpeg62.
> > When images that mak
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:30:40PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> My plan is to move to libjpeg8. libjpeg62 is a technological dead-end.
> libjpeg8 support a larger part of the JPEG standard than libjpeg62.
> When images that make advantage of that start to be widespread, users
> will need libjpeg
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 08:11:50PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> whats the plan, now that freeze is gone?
My plan is to move to libjpeg8. libjpeg62 is a technological dead-end.
libjpeg8 support a larger part of the JPEG standard than libjpeg62.
When images that make advantage of that start
Hi,
whats the plan, now that freeze is gone?
fedora moved to libjpeg-turbo, is there some convincing reason
to go with abi-incompatible new libjpeg version instead?
Riku
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
Hello Bill
Thanks for your efforts. I wouldn't mind trying beta/alpha versions if you have
any somewhere?
Yours,
Gurkan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Bill,
I've taken an interest in libjpeg-turbo and would like to help out
with this. Not sure if anything has happened in the last few weeks,
or if you've been concentrating on squeeze. The version of libjpeg.so
in libjpeg-turbo 1.0.1 looks fine to me -- it has an identical SONAME
as the one p
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 09:40:26AM +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> hello Bill and Laurent
>
> So nobody will try/work on this to have it packaged in debian? What
> about the current versions now?
Hello Gürkan,
The current version of libjpeg-turbo does not have versionned symbols, so it
cannot be
hello Bill and Laurent
So nobody will try/work on this to have it packaged in debian? What about the
current versions now?
yours,
gurkan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: libjpeg8
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
could you please provide libjpeg-turbo, which is much faster than
libjpeg ?
http://libjpeg-turbo.virtualgl.org/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libjpeg-turbo/
It has recently replaced libjpeg in Fedora:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjp
11 matches
Mail list logo
