On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:14:23AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com writes:
I apologize ahead of time for the bts ping pong, but according to the
build log (which is where I checked for my
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:47:27PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:18:09AM +0100, Arne Wichmann wrote:
It does not look like jpake is enabled in sid:
That's correct. It's disabled upstream and we haven't enabled it. I
have no intention of enabling it until upstream
I am 100% certain that this code is not present in the generated object
code, and don't need further assurance of that:
$ nm -D /usr/bin/ssh /usr/sbin/sshd | grep jpake
$
OK, good enough for me. Thanks!
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
It does not look like jpake is enabled in sid:
[130] ~/src/openssh-5.5p1
(518) a...@anhrefn $ find . -type f '!' -name '*.[ch]' |xargs zgrep -i jpake
./ChangeLog: disallow a hostile server from checking jpake auth by sending
an
./ChangeLog: - (dtucker) [auth2-jpake.c auth2.c canohost.h
reopen 606922
thanks
That's correct. It's disabled upstream and we haven't enabled it. I
have no intention of enabling it until upstream say it's OK to do so
(which will probably consist of enabling it by default).
Here's the upstream commit message:
- d...@cvs.openbsd.org 2010/09/20
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com writes:
I apologize ahead of time for the bts ping pong, but according to the
build log (which is where I checked for my original bug report) jpake
is indeed built.
$ debuild | grep jpake
jpake.c is run through the compiler, but the entire file is
tag 606922 patch
thanks
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com writes:
I apologize ahead of time for the bts ping pong, but according to the
build log (which is where I checked for my original bug report) jpake
is indeed built.
$
7 matches
Mail list logo
