Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'm not sure why you believe this is an issue on *any* architecture.
Is was an issue (for me, at least), because a simple security update
gave me a dependency conflict. And I did not think far enough to check
dependencies for all implicated packages.
Agreed, I should
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 20:42 +0100, Joergen Elgaard Larsen wrote:
> After the latest security updates, libdns55 depends on
> libisc52 = 1:9.6.ESV.R1+dfsg-0+lenny2
>
> However, libisc52 is replaced by libisc50, of which I now have a newer
> version:
>
> Package: libisc50
Package: libdns55
Version: 1:9.6.ESV.R1+dfsg-0+lenny2
Severity: important
After the latest security updates, libdns55 depends on
libisc52 = 1:9.6.ESV.R1+dfsg-0+lenny2
However, libisc52 is replaced by libisc50, of which I now have a newer
version:
Package: libisc50
3 matches
Mail list logo