Ian Campbell wrote:
> Earlier, Justin wrote:
>> Mind you, how does this interact with the requirement in the generic
>> upgrade procedure for a kernel change to handle udev? Might that fix
>> it, if xen users are going to need a 2.6.32 xen kernel with extra
>> metapackaginess before they can upgra
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 21:02 +, Justin B Rye wrote:
> (Or unless blah blah manual kernel upgrade blah blah udev, but since
> nobody's answering that question I'll assume it's a "no".)
I saw this question before, meant to come back to it, and forgot, sorry!
Earlier, Justin wrote:
> Mind you, h
Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Apparently now that there are xen-linux-system-2.6-xen-* metapackages
>> in Squeeze this should read something like:
>
> We have this package in Lenny as well, but it wasn't
> enough. The claim you just had it from Ian...
According to
http://packages.debian.org/se
- Original message -
> Apparently now that there are xen-linux-system-2.6-xen-* metapackages
> in Squeeze this should read something like:
We have this package in Lenny as well, but it wasn't
enough. The claim you just had it from Ian...
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I don't want to point fingers here (so I wont check who's involved), but
> I've been advised to point at the wiki. Anyway, this paragraph can now
> be removed if the issue has been fixed.
I haven't seen any claim of a fix for the issue that xen users need to
upgrade manuall
On 01/30/2011 07:13 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 17:32:51 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
>> BTW, why do we refer users to the wiki instead of including the advice
>> inline in the release notes? Is that just the way the release notes are
>> normally written?
>>
> No, if the in
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 17:32:51 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> BTW, why do we refer users to the wiki instead of including the advice
> inline in the release notes? Is that just the way the release notes are
> normally written?
>
No, if the information can reasonably be included inline then we sho
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 01:09 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> - Original message -
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 15:34:23 +, Justin B Rye wrote:
> >
> > > #
> > > # Upgrades from Lenny will not automatically install Xen version 4.0.
> > > Instead # you need to install Xen 4.0 and a corres
- Original message -
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 15:34:23 +, Justin B Rye wrote:
>
> > #
> > # Upgrades from Lenny will not automatically install Xen version 4.0.
> > Instead # you need to install Xen 4.0 and a corresponding dom0 kernel
> > explicitly. See # the wiki page for instructi
Julien Cristau wrote:
>> # Upgrades from Lenny will not automatically install Xen version 4.0. Instead
>> # you need to install Xen 4.0 and a corresponding dom0 kernel explicitly. See
>> # the wiki page for instructions on how to set up the Xen hypervisor and dom0
>> # kernel under Squeeze.
>
> Is
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 15:34:23 +, Justin B Rye wrote:
> #
> # Upgrades from Lenny will not automatically install Xen version 4.0. Instead
> # you need to install Xen 4.0 and a corresponding dom0 kernel explicitly. See
> # the wiki page for instructions on how to set up the Xen hypervisor an
Julien Cristau wrote:
> could somebody please come up with a patch for the release notes re:
> xen? It seems there were more incremental changes after the last patch
> posted on this bug.
The most recent version I saw was:
#
# Xen upgrades
#
# If you installed Xen on Lenny, the kernel booted b
Hi,
could somebody please come up with a patch for the release notes re:
xen? It seems there were more incremental changes after the last patch
posted on this bug.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 20:05 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> - Original message -
> > Actually the sd* naming hasn't been removed from *Xen* itself,
> > just from the pvops (upstream kernel.org) Linux kernel xen-blkfront
> > driver!
> >
> > -- Pasi
>
> whatever has been done upstream, sd* h
- Original message -
> Actually the sd* naming hasn't been removed from *Xen* itself,
> just from the pvops (upstream kernel.org) Linux kernel xen-blkfront
> driver!
>
> -- Pasi
whatever has been done upstream, sd* has been
removed, and the release notes addition above are
giving the cor
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:40:32AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> Thanks. Indeed, there was some possible confusion. Patched accordingly.
>
> Please find the new patch attached to this email.
>
See below for one more comment..
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
> --- release-notes/en/upgrading.dbk.or
On 12/29/2010 07:40 PM, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> Thomas, if you don't mind, i still would like to tweak the text a bit.
>
> Most of your changes look to me like definite improvements, except:
>
>>> This does not happen under GRUB 2 in Squeeze. Instead, the non-Xen
>>> k
17 matches
Mail list logo
