On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:12 AM, tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org wrote:
In lieu of a new upstream release, an email from the upstream clarifying
the license for those files could be added to debian/copyright would
probably be sufficient. Another option would be to drop the files under
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:12 AM, tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org wrote:
In lieu of a new upstream release, an email from the upstream clarifying
the license for those files could be added to debian/copyright would
probably be sufficient. Another option would be to drop the files under
Hi Miguel,
In lieu of a new upstream release, an email from the upstream clarifying
the license for those files could be added to debian/copyright would
probably be sufficient. Another option would be to drop the files under
./test/ in a DFSG version of the tarball. Andrew Ross did this
Hi team,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xhtmlrenderer.
* Package name: xhtmlrenderer
Version : 0.0~R8-1
Upstream Author : Joshua Marinacci jos...@marinacci.org
* URL : https://xhtmlrenderer.dev.java.net/
* License : LGPL-2.1 and others
Section
Hi Miguel,
The packaging looks good. However, unfortunately there are a number of
source files that carry neither a copyright nor an author. For example:
./src/java/org/xhtmlrenderer/tool/Boxer.java
or less trivially:
./src/java/org/xhtmlrenderer/simple/PDFRenderer.java
It might be worth
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 PM, tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Miguel,
Hi Tony,
Thanks for taking a look at my package so quickly.
The packaging looks good. However, unfortunately there are a number of
source files that carry neither a copyright nor an author. For example:
6 matches
Mail list logo
