Bug#608851: libsvm-dev: no need of versioned include/ subdirectory

2011-02-28 Thread Chen-Tse Tsai
Thanks for the report! I'll fix it soon. Best Regards, Chen-Tse 2011/1/4 Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com Package: libsvm-dev Version: 3.0-1 Severity: normal Since there is no libsvm3.0-dev, and multiple versions (e.g. 2.91 and 3.0) of libsvm-dev could not be co-installed on

Bug#608851: libsvm-dev: no need of versioned include/ subdirectory

2011-02-22 Thread Julien Cristau
severity 608851 serious kthxbye On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 19:24:44 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Package: libsvm-dev Version: 3.0-1 Severity: normal Since there is no libsvm3.0-dev, and multiple versions (e.g. 2.91 and 3.0) of libsvm-dev could not be co-installed on the system, it

Bug#608851: libsvm-dev: no need of versioned include/ subdirectory

2011-01-03 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Package: libsvm-dev Version: 3.0-1 Severity: normal Since there is no libsvm3.0-dev, and multiple versions (e.g. 2.91 and 3.0) of libsvm-dev could not be co-installed on the system, it really makes little to no sense to carry additional versioned directory such as /usr/include/libsvm-3.0 on top