On 01/08/2011 11:53 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> So it doesn't strictly need a newer libdrm (in the shared object
> sense), it just needs a bugfix which is included in a newer version
> (or a newer kernel, if that fix is indeed the one you'd need to fix
> your issue).
Hrm... I don't think that's i
Cyril Brulebois (08/01/2011):
> This might be a missing shlibs bump in libdrm; didn't check yet.
This could just be that latest -intel assumes some stuff which isn't
OK with “older” kernels. And that might be fixed in “newer” libdrm. An
example of a possible such fix:
| $ git show 49447a9b957047d
tag 609299 - experimental
thanks
Removing the extraneous experimental tag. The BTS has version
tracking, and that'll do the job.
EspeonEefi (08/01/2011):
> The dependency of the experimental xserver-xorg-video-intel
> (2:2.13.903-1) is libdrm-intel1 (>=2.4.21) and libdrm2 (>=2.4.17),
> both of w
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.13.903-1
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
The dependency of the experimental xserver-xorg-video-intel
(2:2.13.903-1) is libdrm-intel1 (>=2.4.21) and libdrm2 (>=2.4.17), both
of which are satisfiable by the libdrm in sid. However, it seems the
li
4 matches
Mail list logo
