On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 06:34:31PM +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2011 13:56:29 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
I inclined to merge this patch if it's still needed (thinking about the
very last imaplib2 improvements around log). Should I?
Difficult call :-). If we turn off
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:56:28PM +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
On Thu, 5 May 2011 20:18:24 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht
nicolas.s-...@laposte.net wrote:
I agree that it would be nicer.
But that would entail some content analysis of each and every email
that we handle. I don't want to think
On Sat, 7 May 2011 13:56:29 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
I inclined to merge this patch if it's still needed (thinking about the
very last imaplib2 improvements around log). Should I?
Difficult call :-). If we turn off the extremely verbose imaplib2 debug,
we don't get the full messages in
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 06:00:01PM +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
We were outputting full message bodies to the debug log (often stderr),
and then again (as they go over the imaplib2 wire, imaplib logs
everything too). Not only is quite a privacy issue when sending in debug
logs but it can
On Thu, 5 May 2011 20:18:24 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht nicolas.s-...@laposte.net
wrote:
Only output the first and last 100 bytes of each message body to the
debug log (we still get the full body from imaplib2 logging). This
limits privacy issues when handing the log to someone else, but
5 matches
Mail list logo
