On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 22:37 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> On 22 March 2011 22:42, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Any news on either of the uploads?
>
> Apologies for the delay. RL is throwing up some issues which are
> taking my time at the moment. I hope to get to it at the weekend.
No worries;
On 22 March 2011 22:42, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Any news on either of the uploads?
Apologies for the delay. RL is throwing up some issues which are
taking my time at the moment. I hope to get to it at the weekend.
Regards
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debi
Hi,
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 22:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 22:57 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> For the record, I'd be happy with the squeeze upload either as is or
> with the quilt bump + more expansive changelog entry; the main issue
> with the original was the lack
On 6 March 2011 23:56, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Adam is correct, I bumped b-d to shut up lintian:
Thanks for confirming that.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
* Jeffrey Ratcliffe , 2011-03-06, 22:57:
- It would be nice if the reasoning for the quilt build-dep bump was
mentioned. My suspicion is that this is due to the use of "dh
--with-quilt" triggering a lintian warning but this isn't really
necessary for stable as the relevant quilt version is alr
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 22:57 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On 6 March 2011 00:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > - Testing and unstable have tesseract 2.04-2.1, so the package for
> > stable would need to have a lower version than that. I'd suggest 2.04-2
> > +squeeze1, which is conv
Hi Adam,
On 6 March 2011 00:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> - Testing and unstable have tesseract 2.04-2.1, so the package for
> stable would need to have a lower version than that. I'd suggest 2.04-2
> +squeeze1, which is conventional.
Sure. This will be my first contribution directly to stable o
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 23:43 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> Attached are debdiffs to fix #612032 for the relevant packages in
> lenny and squeeze.
Thanks for working on this.
> Are you happy for these to be uploaded to stable/oldstable?
The oldstable diff looks fine, thanks.
The squeeze updat
Attached are debdiffs to fix #612032 for the relevant packages in
lenny and squeeze.
Are you happy for these to be uploaded to stable/oldstable?
Would you like separate bugs to be opened for each distribution? At
the moment, the same sid/wheezy bug is quoted/closed.
Regards
Jeff Ratcliffe
tes
Dear maintainer,
Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed
this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security
Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following suites
through point releases:
lenny (5.0.9)
squeeze (6.0.1)
Pleas
10 matches
Mail list logo
