Hi!
Am 14.03.2011 22:22, schrieb Craig Sanders:
First of all, note that the next time you do that, I will request
blacklisting for your address on the BTS email gateway.
WTF for?
As repeatedly said:
1) The package has currently no maintainer.
2) The package is no longer developed upstream.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:47:48PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
On dim., 2011-03-13 at 18:34 +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
reopen 613491
First of all, note that the next time you do that, I will request
blacklisting for your address on the BTS email gateway.
WTF for?
silly me for
reopen 613491
thanks
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 02:54:12PM +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On -10/01/37 20:59, Craig Sanders wrote:
reopen 613491
thanks
Reopening RM bugs is pointless... we can't remove a package twice :)
the point is that it shouldn't have been removed.
undo, rather
On 03/13/2011 10:31 PM, Craig Sanders wrote:
reopen 613491
thanks
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 02:54:12PM +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On -10/01/37 20:59, Craig Sanders wrote:
reopen 613491
thanks
Reopening RM bugs is pointless... we can't remove a package twice :)
the point is
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:03:46PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
So why do you expect its packagers to fork or take over upstream of
gdm?
i'm not. i'm merely expecting them not to remove a useful package for no
good reason.
OK, the actual issues here are Gnome's fault but prematurely removing
On dim., 2011-03-13 at 18:34 +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
reopen 613491
First of all, note that the next time you do that, I will request
blacklisting for your address on the BTS email gateway.
even figuring out something simple, like how to disable the
privacy-infringing security-reducing
reopen 613491
thanks
i only noticed a few days ago when i built a new debian desktop system
that gdm is no longer available, in favour of gdm3.
gdm3 is NOT an adequate replacement for gdm. useful features that are
readily apparent and easily configurable in gdm are either missing
completely or
7 matches
Mail list logo
