On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 06:00:33PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
David has not responded in 7 days and the package looks largely
unmaintained.
If you are still interested, would you consider packaging 2.70 and
taking over the package?
Hello,
Sorry for the delay.
I'm interested in
Hi,
On Montag, 7. März 2011, Etienne Millon wrote:
I'm interested in maintaining the package. However this would be my
first python package, so I may do a few policy mistakes at first :)
What is the correct way to take over the package ? Only change the
Maintainer field and add a new
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:41:05AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
(Not only) considering it's your first package (or first python package?), I
would suggest you and David maintain the package together?
I am currently adopting zsnes (assembly + C, packaged using debhelper)
as part of the debian
also sprach Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com [2011.02.23.1015 +0100]:
(I'm the one who uploaded 2.69 to mentors and tagged those bugs)
I thought that David was MIA and took the initiative to prepare a new
version. As 2.69 will probably not hit the archive, I'm untagging the
bugs. For
tags 518410 - pending
tags 447144 - pending
thanks
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:20:32AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Also, 518410 and 447144 are tagged pending, which I think is not really true,
as new upstream versions should not be introduced with an NMU...
Hello,
(I'm the one who uploaded
package: rss2email
severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: etienne.mil...@gmail.com
Hi David,
2.70 is out and 2.69 is available on mentors (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=447144#35) - what are your
plans for this package?
Also, 518410 and 447144 are tagged pending, which I
6 matches
Mail list logo
