Bug#614907: Draft resolution for node+nodejs

2012-07-08 Thread Steve Langasek
So the deadline I set myself for this is now long past; sorry about that. Responding to comments - call for votes will come in a separate message. On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:20:24PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:52:39PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Sorry this is so long

Bug#614907: Draft resolution for node+nodejs

2012-06-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:52:39PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Sorry this is so long in coming. Here's the draft resolution for this issue, agreed at the last IRC meeting. I thought about including a statement censuring nodejs upstream for their unhelpful behavior around this issue, but we

Bug#614907: Draft resolution for node+nodejs

2012-06-28 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi all, Sorry this is so long in coming. Here's the draft resolution for this issue, agreed at the last IRC meeting. I thought about including a statement censuring nodejs upstream for their unhelpful behavior around this issue, but we didn't actually discuss that at the IRC meeting so I don't

Bug#614907: Draft resolution for node+nodejs

2012-06-28 Thread Steve Langasek
[Whoops, forgot the magic header for packages.qa.d.o; resending.] Hi all, Sorry this is so long in coming. Here's the draft resolution for this issue, agreed at the last IRC meeting. I thought about including a statement censuring nodejs upstream for their unhelpful behavior around this issue,