Bug#618026: ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes

2011-09-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 618026 + pending thanks On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 12:34 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: Hi Adam (2011.09.22_20:20:54_+0200) Happy to add a NEWS entry, though. That sounds good; thanks. New debdiff attached. Please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#618026: ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes

2011-09-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 14:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: tag 618026 + pending Hmmm, that should have been confirmed; saves me having to +pending now though, so never mind. On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 12:34 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: Hi Adam (2011.09.22_20:20:54_+0200) Happy to add a NEWS

Bug#618026: ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes

2011-09-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 13:46 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: Hi Adam (2011.09.20_20:08:41_+0200) Yeah, I can see the problem. I just wonder if there's some way we can reduce the number of why can't I see my logs any more bugs as a result (preferably to none). There are few users that we

Bug#618026: ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes

2011-09-21 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Adam (2011.09.20_20:08:41_+0200) Yeah, I can see the problem. I just wonder if there's some way we can reduce the number of why can't I see my logs any more bugs as a result (preferably to none). There are few users that we know about, so I'm not massively concerned about this. Happy to

Bug#618026: ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes

2011-09-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Adam (2011.09.17_18:09:13_+0200) If you're going to do that, you need to either (preferably) CC the receiving package on your mail, or send a separate mail. What tends to happen (as in this case) is that the control@ reassign gets processed after the rest of the mail has been received and

Bug#618026: ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes

2011-09-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 12:33 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: Hi Adam (2011.09.17_18:09:13_+0200) One quick question - doesn't this change: +- logfile-visibility-567576.patch: Channels must be explicitly configured + to have publicly readable logs. (LP: #567576) have the

Bug#618026: ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes

2011-09-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 618026 + squeeze moreinfo - upstream patch security retitle 618026 pu: package ibid/0.1.0+dfsg-2+squeeze1 thanks On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 22:07 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: reassign 618026 release.debian.org If you're going to do that, you need to either (preferably) CC the receiving package

Bug#618026: ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes

2011-09-07 Thread Stefano Rivera
reassign 618026 release.debian.org severity 618026 normal user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 618026 pu thanks Ibid 0.1.1 fixes 3 security issues [0]. They aren't particularly serious, but should probably be addressed. Right, clearly not significant enough for the usual

Bug#618026: ibid: Ibid 0.1.1 contains 3 security fixes

2011-03-13 Thread Stefano Rivera
Package: ibid Version: 0.1.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: security upstream patch Ibid 0.1.1 fixes 3 security issues [0]. They aren't particularly serious, but should probably be addressed. [0]: http://ibid.omnia.za.net/docs/0.1.0/changes.html#release-0-1-1-pimpernel-2011-02-24 Remote