2011/4/18 Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr:
On 04/18/2011 05:29 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
2011/4/16 Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr:
On 04/16/2011 01:32 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 16/04/11 at 10:43 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
What the state of collaboration with the upstream packagers?
On 04/17/2011 01:05 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:43:43AM +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
Again, if other DDs want to participate to this packaging effort, you'd
be welcome. Especially, it seems that the current version of euca tools
are broken (uec-publish-tarball got
On 04/18/2011 03:03 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
Making the package lintian is a great goal!
It's not a goal, it's a requirement for any DD before uploading to the
archive.
I don't think any of the issues
with the packages would be considered RC problems.
Missing (build-)dependencies are
2011/4/18 Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr:
As for the fact that you had to release it with a schedule date, I
*guessed* it myself. Only, saying it explicitly would have helped
communication.
Sorry, I don't understand what you're saying here.
most being the operative word. You've proposed a
- Original message -
Le Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:43:43AM +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
Again, if other DDs want to participate to this packaging effort, you'd
be welcome. Especially, it seems that the current version of euca tools
are broken (uec-publish-tarball got me stuck on
2011/4/16 Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr:
On 04/16/2011 01:32 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 16/04/11 at 10:43 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
What the state of collaboration with the upstream packagers?
Replied more extensively privately to that one.
This, even more than your constant lecturing
On 04/18/2011 05:29 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
2011/4/16 Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr:
On 04/16/2011 01:32 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 16/04/11 at 10:43 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
What the state of collaboration with the upstream packagers?
Replied more extensively privately to that one.
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:29:07PM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
This, even more than your constant lecturing on Debian policy, frankly
pisses me off.
If you have something to say, at the very least have the guts to say
it in public, otherwise this collaboration ends right here.
I find it
2011/4/18 Clint Adams cl...@debian.org:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:29:07PM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
This, even more than your constant lecturing on Debian policy, frankly
pisses me off.
If you have something to say, at the very least have the guts to say
it in public, otherwise this
On 04/16/2011 01:32 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 16/04/11 at 10:43 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
This is a short email to let everyone know about the current status of
the package.
Cactus, the first serious release of Openstack Compute - nova, has been
released yesterday. I have done
Le Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:43:43AM +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
Again, if other DDs want to participate to this packaging effort, you'd
be welcome. Especially, it seems that the current version of euca tools
are broken (uec-publish-tarball got me stuck on my work for a week), and
would
Hi,
This is a short email to let everyone know about the current status of
the package.
Cactus, the first serious release of Openstack Compute - nova, has been
released yesterday. I have done loads of patches to have the package to
fit in Debian, comply with the policy, and be lintian clean. The
On 16/04/11 at 10:43 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
This is a short email to let everyone know about the current status of
the package.
Cactus, the first serious release of Openstack Compute - nova, has been
released yesterday. I have done loads of patches to have the package to
fit in
13 matches
Mail list logo
