On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 23:39 +0400, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
> May be refer to documentation or config option wich specify this.
> Well simple "username is not allowed by regexp
> user_regexp_config_variable" is much more informative. I just need
> keyword to look for in manual.
Thanks for the
Hello, Arthur.
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 21:03:08 +0200
Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 11:12 +0400, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
> > > The cause of this problem is the new regular expression based
> > > checks for valid usernames. It currently rejects usernames of
> > > less than three
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 11:12 +0400, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
> > The cause of this problem is the new regular expression based checks
> > for valid usernames. It currently rejects usernames of less than three
> > characters. This will be fixed in the next release (the minimum will
> > be two the
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:24:32 +0200
Arthur de Jong wrote:
> retitle 620235 problems with short usernames
> tags 620235 + pending
> thanks
>
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 14:50 +0400, Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
> > Today nslcd upgraded to 0.8.2 and I catched the following bug.
> >
> > It fails to resolve u
retitle 620235 problems with short usernames
tags 620235 + pending
thanks
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 14:50 +0400, Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
> Today nslcd upgraded to 0.8.2 and I catched the following bug.
>
> It fails to resolve username 'gq' in ldap. Other users works fine.
> Looks like it doesn't lo
Package: nslcd
Version: 0.8.2
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
Hi there.
Today nslcd upgraded to 0.8.2 and I catched the following bug.
It fails to resolve username 'gq' in ldap. Other users works fine.
Looks like it doesn't look in ldap at all:
nslcd: [8b4567] DEBUG: connection from pid=
6 matches
Mail list logo
