Bug#620814: initramfs-tools: fails to include essential module for other leg of md0

2011-11-23 Thread Michael Prokop
* Arno Schuring [Mit Apr 06, 2011 at 01:00:23 +0200]: Thusly spoke maximilian attems (m...@debian.org on 2011-04-05 06:44 +): [...] As you noticed the file is unowned and can be removed and the initramfs regenerated. Nevertheless your fail in MODULES=dep is interesting and didn't

Bug#620814: initramfs-tools: fails to include essential module for other leg of md0

2011-04-05 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:15:21PM +, Arno Schuring wrote: no, check your box with: egrep MODULES -r /etc/initramfs-tools/ Great. /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:# MODULES: [ most | netboot | dep | list ] /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:MODULES=most

Bug#620814: initramfs-tools: fails to include essential module for other leg of md0

2011-04-05 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:15:21PM +, Arno Schuring wrote: So, which one is the preferred location? Will anything break if I just clear out the conf.d directory? ladmin@fury:~$ dpkg -S /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/* dpkg: /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy not found. dpkg:

Bug#620814: initramfs-tools: fails to include essential module for other leg of md0

2011-04-05 Thread Arno Schuring
Thusly spoke maximilian attems (m...@debian.org on 2011-04-05 06:44 +): On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:15:21PM +, Arno Schuring wrote: no, check your box with: egrep MODULES -r /etc/initramfs-tools/ Great. /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:# MODULES: [ most | netboot |

Bug#620814: initramfs-tools: fails to include essential module for other leg of md0

2011-04-04 Thread Arno Schuring
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.98.8 Severity: normal (resending manually because exim hadn't been configured yet) This is a new Wheezy install on an old server machine. The machine has four PATA disks, tied to two controllers. The four disks are combined into a SW-raid volume using mdadm:

Bug#620814: initramfs-tools: fails to include essential module for other leg of md0

2011-04-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:28:15PM +0200, Arno Schuring wrote: Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.98.8 Severity: normal (resending manually because exim hadn't been configured yet) This is a new Wheezy install on an old server machine. The machine has four PATA disks, tied to two

Bug#620814: initramfs-tools: fails to include essential module for other leg of md0

2011-04-04 Thread Arno Schuring
Hi Ben, During installation, I configured initramfs-tools to determine the required modules automatically, which resulted in a non-booting system (notice that the sil680 module is missing): [...] The initramfs-tools 'MODULES=dep' mode is primarily meant for small systems with limited

Bug#620814: initramfs-tools: fails to include essential module for other leg of md0

2011-04-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:21:16PM +, Arno Schuring wrote: Hi Ben, During installation, I configured initramfs-tools to determine the required modules automatically, which resulted in a non-booting system (notice that the sil680 module is missing): [...] The

Bug#620814: initramfs-tools: fails to include essential module for other leg of md0

2011-04-04 Thread Arno Schuring
no, check your box with: egrep MODULES -r /etc/initramfs-tools/ Great. /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:# MODULES: [ most | netboot | dep | list ] /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:MODULES=most /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy:MODULES=dep So, which one is the preferred