Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Here is an updated patch that tries to remedy those concerns. The
requirement for /run and /run/lock is a separate point in the FHS
exception list, and a new section under 9.1 has been added to spell out
explicitly, for everyone, the requirements on
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 09:58:45AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Note that this version of the patch explicitly says that packages
should use /run and /run/lock in preference to /var/run and
/var/lock. My understanding is that this is where we want to
Hello everyone (and happy new year!),
I read through all of the discussion of this bug and reviewed the latest
patches, and I had the following concerns.
1. A lot of the discussion of /run and /run/lock was in a non-normative
footnote, but it was really normative text. It didn't fit well
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 09:58:45AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Comments, objections, seconds?
Seconded.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:29:16PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:08:18PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Would anybody object to Roger patch being applied without the reference to
/run/shm, and leave this particular topic to another bug report ?
Beside, I attach an
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 05:50:52PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 08.06.2011 23:22, schrieb Bill Allombert:
Hello Cyril and Michael,
Are you willing to resecond this as the final version ?
At the current state, I'm not for adding /run/shm to debian-policy.
If we can get wider
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:08:18PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 05:50:52PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 08.06.2011 23:22, schrieb Bill Allombert:
Hello Cyril and Michael,
Are you willing to resecond this as the final version ?
At the current state,
BTW, my alternative patch was intended only to improve the wording,
not to change the import. I hope I succeeded (in improving it) and,
if so, that you'll accept the improvement.
Cheers,
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Michael Biebl wrote:
At the current state, I'm not for adding /run/shm to debian-policy.
If we can get wider acceptance of this feature (cross-distro), then my
position
on this might change. Atm this looks like a Debian-only feature with no real
use-case why we need
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:08:18PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Would anybody object to Roger patch being applied without the reference to
/run/shm, and leave this particular topic to another bug report ?
Beside, I attach an alternative patch by Thomas Hood that I found in the
log but which
Am 08.06.2011 23:22, schrieb Bill Allombert:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:25:18AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi,
I have attached the full patch against current policy.git. This is
identical to the previous patches, with the addition of a single
sentence to the footnote:
Additionally, the
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:25:18AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi,
I have attached the full patch against current policy.git. This is
identical to the previous patches, with the addition of a single
sentence to the footnote:
Additionally, the subdirectory file/run/shm/file is a replacement
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:43:02PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:27:48PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
+ replacement for file/var/run/file, and its
+ subdirectory file/run/lock/file is a replacement
for
+
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:53:12PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Hello Roger,
I think the /run implementatio has progressed far enough to update policy.
Your last patch was relative to a previous one. Could you regenerate it
relative to current policy and seconders be so kind as to resecond
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:34:38PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.1.0
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please could you add /run as an exception to the FHS? I've attached
a patch with proposed text.
References:
#620191 - initscripts support for /run
#620157 -
Hi,
Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org (04/04/2011):
+ additionally allowed: file/run/file,
+ file/sys/file and file/selinux/file.
+ footnoteThe file/run/file directory is a
+ replacement for file/var/run/file, and its
+
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net (05/04/2011):
Updated patch attached. To match existing usage in the document,
I've switch both to the singular reboot since the contents will
be lost over a single reboot. Hope that's OK?
Surely.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:55:21PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org (04/04/2011):
+ should not be preserved across reboot.
“reboots” if you want to stay consistent with the hunk below.
+ contents are not preserved across reboots.
Hi!
+ replacement for file/var/run/file, and its
+ subdirectory file/run/lock/file is a replacement for
+ file/var/lock/file. These changes have been
+ adopted by most distributions and have been proposed
+
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:27:48PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
+ replacement for file/var/run/file, and its
+ subdirectory file/run/lock/file is a replacement for
+ file/var/lock/file. These changes have been
+ adopted by
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:34:38PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.1.0
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please could you add /run as an exception to the FHS? I've attached
a patch with proposed text.
References:
#620191 - initscripts support for /run
#620157 -
Am 05.04.2011 20:13, schrieb Bill Allombert:
I suggest to wait until /run exists in unstable systems, but not until
packages are
using it. This allows developers to notice the change and maybe comment on
the patch.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/base-files/news/20110405T161708Z.html
--
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.1.0
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please could you add /run as an exception to the FHS? I've attached
a patch with proposed text.
References:
#620191 - initscripts support for /run
#620157 - base-files provides /run
23 matches
Mail list logo
