Bug#621467: [PATCH] Add more mailer choices to metche

2011-04-15 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Kan-Ru Chen wrote (07 Apr 2011 06:55:10 GMT) : > Currently metche uses mutt to send mails, but on a minimum installed > system mutt might not a feasible choice. This is right. An old "provide lightweight alternative to Mutt" wishlist bug has been sitting in our upstream bug tracker for years

Bug#621467: [PATCH] Add more mailer choices to metche

2011-04-06 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
Package: metche Severity: wishlist Tags: patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Currently metche uses mutt to send mails, but on a minimum installed system mutt might not a feasible choice. Attached patches add the support to use two more mailer choices, mailx and mail-transpor

Bug#621467: [PATCH] Add more mailer choices to metche

2011-05-29 Thread intrigeri
tags 621467 + fixed-upstream thanks Hi, I've merged your patch, slightly adapted to default to using mutt if available, into upstream Git master branch. Adding a FAQ was needed since heirloom-mailx does not play well with LOCALE=C metche sets by default, when combined with non-US-ASCII chars in m

Bug#621467: [PATCH] Add more mailer choices to metche

2011-05-29 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
intrigeri writes: > I've merged your patch, slightly adapted to default to using mutt if > available, into upstream Git master branch. Adding a FAQ was needed > since heirloom-mailx does not play well with LOCALE=C metche sets by > default, when combined with non-US-ASCII chars in monitored files

Bug#621467: [PATCH] Add more mailer choices to metche

2011-05-27 Thread intrigeri
Hi Kan-Ru Chen, intrigeri wrote (14 Apr 2011 23:51:06 GMT) : > Here are a few questions meant to clarify things a bit before I or > others investigate this further: > 1. What version(s) of mailx / sendmail have you tested your patch > against? > 2. Did you test your patch with !ascii con

Bug#621467: [PATCH] Add more mailer choices to metche

2011-05-27 Thread intrigeri
Hi again, two more questions bellow about details I'm unsure about in your patch. Kan-Ru Chen wrote (07 Apr 2011 06:55:10 GMT) : > +add_header() { > +local subject="$1"; > +echo "Subject: $subject"; > +echo "To: $EMAIL_ADDRESS"; > +echo > +cat; > +} Why the ';' between those

Bug#621467: [PATCH] Add more mailer choices to metche

2011-05-27 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
Hi! Sorry for the delay, I didn't find time to test the encoding setup. The patch was tested against mailx and sendmail in the squeeze archive. I've tested both ENCRYPT_EMAIL set to yes and no, and use yes for my machine. I suspect if this patch can handle different charset because it only sends

Bug#621467: [PATCH] Add more mailer choices to metche

2011-05-27 Thread intrigeri
Hi, > Sorry for the delay, I didn't find time to test the encoding setup. No problems. Thanks for your detailed answers. I've merged your patch (and cleaned up the spurious ';' chars) into a dedicated branch in upstream Git (feature/2976-alternatives-to-mutt). I intend to test it soon in various