Le Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:18:50 -0500,
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com a écrit :
Actually, it would be interesting to find how new the kernel has to be
to avoid this bug. That is, first try v2.6.35.14 and then bisect the
fix:
…
Hello,
I'll try to do this, but as it needs some time
Le Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:53:06 -0500,
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com a écrit :
Robert Scott wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I think we are long overdue to take this one upstream. I have a
few questions anyway for before then:
- does hibernation work for
forwarded 622259 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41982
quit
Frédéric Boiteux wrote:
Robert already did tests very quickly, but I'll try also to give some
info : I've tried 2.6.39-bpo.2-686-pae, making 4 hibernations with some
pauses between them, and it worked each time (the bug
forwarded 622259
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable/6341/focus=16950
quit
Robert Scott wrote:
I'm afraid both 2.6.32.45 and 2.6.33.18 are a fail.
Thanks for checking so quickly. Let's take this upstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
found 622259 linux-2.6/2.6.32-34
# regression
severity 622259 important
merge 622259 623149
quit
Hi Robert and Frédéric,
Frédéric Boiteux wrote:
I've tried the 2.6.32-34 Debian kernel recently released for Squeeze,
and the bug is still present.
Thanks, and sorry for the late reply.
I
On Saturday 27 August 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I think we are long overdue to take this one upstream. I have a few
questions anyway for before then:
- does hibernation work for you if you try a sid (3.x) kernel?
Would 2.6.39+35.1 (from squeeze-backports) do? It's a lot easier to get
Robert Scott wrote:
On Saturday 27 August 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I think we are long overdue to take this one upstream. I have a few
questions anyway for before then:
- does hibernation work for you if you try a sid (3.x) kernel?
Would 2.6.39+35.1 (from squeeze-backports) do? It's
On Saturday 27 August 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
- does hibernation work for you if you try a sid (3.x) kernel?
Would 2.6.39+35.1 (from squeeze-backports) do? It's a lot easier to get
installed ;)
Or is there a specific relevant patch that's gone into 3.*?
Sure, 2.6.39 is fine.
8 matches
Mail list logo