Steinar H. Gunderson, le Fri 19 Aug 2011 22:41:42 +0200, a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:04:37PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I have reworked the patch a bit, extended it, tested it, and will NMU-0
> > it, here is the diff
>
> Hold on... Why do you 0-day NMU other people's packages (wi
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:10:40PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Because we sometimes have to move on: pvm has seen very low activity in
> the past months/years, is holding quite a few packages, and there was no
> comment from you on this patch for some time.
That is correct; pvm has not been ve
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:04:37PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I have reworked the patch a bit, extended it, tested it, and will NMU-0
> it, here is the diff
Hold on... Why do you 0-day NMU other people's packages (with rather
nontrivial patches) for porting bugs? :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepa
Hello,
I have reworked the patch a bit, extended it, tested it, and will NMU-0
it, here is the diff
Samuel
diff -urN pvm-3.4.5/debian/changelog pvm-3.4.5+nmu/debian/changelog
--- pvm-3.4.5/debian/changelog 2011-08-19 21:00:34.0 +
+++ pvm-3.4.5+nmu/debian/changelog 2011-08-19 21:
Package: pvm
Version: 3.4.5-12.2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Usertags: hurd
Attached is a patch to enable successful build of pvm on
GNU/Hurd. It should be applied after the patch:
06-thread-safe-ctime.patch, preferably last.
Thanks!
--- pvm-3.4.5/srcpvmd.c.06-patched 2011-04-15 09:03:19.000
5 matches
Mail list logo
