Bug#622980: swig: wrapper does not compile with python 3.2

2011-04-16 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Package: swig Version: 1.3.40-3 Severity: critical Tags: upstream Justification: breaks unrelated software See upstream bug: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101645&aid=3057804&group_id=1645 This bug prevents me from building e.g. znc (and so on also prevents me from fixing anothe

Bug#622980: swig: wrapper does not compile with python 3.2

2011-04-16 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi Patrick, On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 13:03 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Package: swig > Version: 1.3.40-3 > Severity: critical > Tags: upstream > Justification: breaks unrelated software > > See upstream bug: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101645&aid=3057804&group_id=1645 > >

Bug#622980: swig: wrapper does not compile with python 3.2

2011-04-16 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 16.04.2011 16:07, schrieb Torsten Landschoff: > Hi Patrick, > > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 13:03 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Package: swig >> Version: 1.3.40-3 >> Severity: critical >> Tags: upstream >> Justification: breaks unrelated software >> >> See upstream bug: >> http://sourceforge.net/t

Bug#622980: swig: wrapper does not compile with python 3.2

2011-04-17 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 16:10 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > I am sorry to say that it is non-trivial to merge a fix to this bug. > > Upstream revision 12620 contains the fix according to the upstream bug. > > However, the fix is not released yet and will only make it into SWIG > > 2.0.4 which ac

Bug#622980: swig: wrapper does not compile with python 3.2

2011-04-17 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 17.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Torsten Landschoff: > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 16:10 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > >>> I am sorry to say that it is non-trivial to merge a fix to this bug. >>> Upstream revision 12620 contains the fix according to the upstream bug. >>> However, the fix is not released y

Bug#622980: swig: wrapper does not compile with python 3.2

2011-05-03 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 21:08 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > > Now that squeeze is released I should really start that transition... > > > > Unfortunately, the diff of r12620 does not apply to swig 2.0.3 as it > > depends on a bunch of other changes. > > Packaging a VCS snapshot of swig2.0? :)