2012/4/26 Michael Vogt m...@debian.org:
This bugreport is interessting and I'm happy to implement the required
change to not send a mail if nothing changes. However I wonder if that
is what should be default?
Great.
I mean, it seems like its very interessting to know that a package did
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 01:43:16PM +0300, Teodor MICU wrote:
I've retested this problem with u-a version 0.76.3 and I see that the
problem is still not fixed but also that the logic is already
implemented in another block: saving a log file or not.
See attached debug log. That message was
I've retested this problem with u-a version 0.76.3 and I see that the
problem is still not fixed but also that the logic is already
implemented in another block: saving a log file or not.
See attached debug log. That message was printed only on console
(stdout), even though the last lines are
Version: 0.75.1
2011/5/6 Teodor mteo...@gmail.com:
At this point in time many packages are on hold for broken dependencies
due to current transitions (i.e. perl 5.12.x). Thus there are days when
there are available packages upgrades that cannot be installed safely
without removing other
Package: unattended-upgrades
Version: 0.70
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
At this point in time many packages are on hold for broken dependencies
due to current transitions (i.e. perl 5.12.x). Thus there are days when
there are available packages upgrades that cannot be installed safely
without removing
5 matches
Mail list logo
