Bug#630325: [ovs-dev] Bug#630325: Bug#630325: openvswitch: FTBFS on big-endian architectures

2011-06-15 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:05:35PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:04:39PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:56:52PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:51:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough

Bug#630325: [ovs-dev] Bug#630325: Bug#630325: openvswitch: FTBFS on big-endian architectures

2011-06-14 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:04:39PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:56:52PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:51:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with the output to determine > > > the problem without digging muc

Bug#630325: [ovs-dev] Bug#630325: Bug#630325: openvswitch: FTBFS on big-endian architectures

2011-06-14 Thread Simon Horman
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:56:52PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:51:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with the output to determine > > the problem without digging much further. Perhaps you have some ideas. > > > > The detailed output f

Bug#630325: [ovs-dev] Bug#630325: Bug#630325: openvswitch: FTBFS on big-endian architectures

2011-06-14 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:51:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with the output to determine > the problem without digging much further. Perhaps you have some ideas. > > The detailed output from sparc is below. > I believe that the output is similar if not the