On 06/16/2011 05:33 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org, 2011-06-16, 14:40:
This looked fishy to me as well, and not-applying it fixes the above
problem. However, it breaks the test of the new docstring_signature
feature instead:
* Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org, 2011-06-17, 20:39:
When do you plan to make the next regular release?
On Sunday.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 06/15/2011 06:00 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org, 2011-06-15, 12:57:
==
FAIL: test_autodoc.test_generate
--
Traceback (most recent
* Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org, 2011-06-16, 14:40:
This looked fishy to me as well, and not-applying it fixes the above
problem. However, it breaks the test of the new docstring_signature
feature instead:
==
FAIL:
On 06/13/2011 10:03 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org, 2011-06-13, 15:33:
Would it be possible to backport the following two changesets from
Sphinx 1.1pre into the debian sphinx package?
https://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/sphinx/changeset/de340a6098c7
* Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org, 2011-06-15, 12:57:
==
FAIL: test_autodoc.test_generate
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Package: sphinx
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Would it be possible to backport the following two changesets from Sphinx
1.1pre into the debian sphinx package?
https://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/sphinx/changeset/de340a6098c7
https://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/sphinx/changeset/a8b0ef275438
* Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org, 2011-06-13, 15:33:
Would it be possible to backport the following two changesets from
Sphinx 1.1pre into the debian sphinx package?
https://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/sphinx/changeset/de340a6098c7
https://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/sphinx/changeset/a8b0ef275438
8 matches
Mail list logo
